The cultural/economical American Empire - dealing with a tyrant - why the Democratic and the Republican Party cannot be trusted 

Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!


The cultural/economical American Empire - dealing with a tyrant - why the Democratic and the Republican Party cannot be trusted


"From 1945 to the end of the [20th] century, the USA attempted to overthrow more than 40 foreign governments, and to crush more than 30 populist-nationalist movements struggling against intolerable regimes. In the process, the USA caused the end of life for several million people, and condemned many millions more to a life of agony and despair".

William Blum, USA writer from the book, “Rogue State”

The US is the last Empire on earth. It doesn’t control its vassal states through direct territorial domination but rather through cultural and economical domination. It will generally allow their vassals (especially their Western European crown vassals) self determination as long as they don’t implement policies (cultural/economical) that hurts the US in any way. The US indirectly controls Europe, especially Western Europe, a legacy which it has maintained since WW2 and through the cold war until today. And of course, we have the many banana republic’s of Latin America, most of which are now included in the US cultural/economical Empire. The same goes for many African and Middle Eastern states. The US, often assisted by its other vassal states (through NATO) has ensured to place corrupt puppet leaders in charge of the majority of Muslim countries.


The difference between the Middle Eastern and Latin American vassal states on the one hand and its European vassals is that we are consider crown vassals with extra rights in the US cultural/economical Empire.


Methods used by the US to ensure order in the vassal states:



· Threats/diplomacy

· Psychological warfare (through its affiliated media corporations)

· Various other forms of intervention including cultural, economical and military means

· Economical hitmen, as soon as there is a regime shift in one of the vassal states (where a hostile leader emerges) the US will first send an economical hitman to demand loyalty from the new ruler. The hitman will present an offer; he will say f example; in one pocket I have 1 billion dollars which is a gift to you (or a suitable sum depending on several factors). In the other pocket I have a gun, which we will use to kill you should you refuse our first offer. The choice is yours. They will list multiple former regimes they have toppled/state leaders they have murdered etc. to attempt to scare the new regime from turning down the offer.



Since 1945, the USA has been responsible either directly or indirectly of helping remove dozens of governments, many democratically elected, around the world. Sometimes the events are kept secret for years and only slowly come out. Other times, the events are the cause of demonstrations, anger and resentment at the time they occur.


Whenever, an event like this occurs there are two reasons to be considered:


Reason 1: The reason given by the USA, its media and its friends around the world. Reasons like Communism, Terrorism, Fascism, Human Rights, Freedom, Liberation, Weapons of Mass Destruction, etc.


Reason 2: The actual reason. This is usually hidden from the general public and has to be looked for in quotes by under-reported officials or subsequent events on the ground. Often, the victims of the intervention/change of government know the real reasons better than the populations of the Western countries. Real reasons are many but usually include Business Interests, Access to Resources, Markets, Military Bases, Strategic Value, or Political Support.


In the list below only successful changes of government and other substantial political interventions are listed. Many attempts have failed. Cuba is the best example of this. European incidents in bold:



Past US interventions


Year Country Reason Given Actual Reason
    Syria   Communism   Elected government against USA political interests and pro-Palestinian.
  Greece Communism Elected government against USA political and economic interests.
  Cuba None Elected government against USA business interests.
  Iran None Elected government against USA oil interests.
  Br. Guyana None Access to sugar and bauxite.
  Guatemala Communism Elected government against USA business interests.
  S. Vietnam Communism French backed leader replaced by USA backed leader.
  Haiti Haiti is near the USA Previous government against USA business interests.
  Laos None Pro-USA government wanted.
  Laos None Pro-USA government wanted.
  S. Korea Communism Previous leader not strong enough for USA.
  Laos None Pro-USA government wanted.
  Ecuador Communism Previous government too independent in foreign policy.
  Dominican R. Business Interests Elected government against USA business interests.
  S. Vietnam None Previous leader's policies led to televised suicides.
  Honduras Communism Pro-USA government and access to resources.
  Guatemala Communism Military government was about to allow elections.
  Ecuador None Elected government too independent.
  Brazil Communism Access to resources and cheap labour.
  Bolivia Communism Previous government too independent in foreign policy.
  Zaire None Access to cobalt, copper and diamonds.
  Ghana None Previous government too independent in foreign policy.
  Greece None Military bases.
  Cambodia None Previous king against USA political interests.
  Bolivia None Country took ownership of its oil and tin.
  El Salvador Communism Elected leader against USA business interests.
  Chile Communism Elected government against USA business interests.
  Australia None Elected government had unsuitable foreign policy.
  South Korea None Pro-USA government wanted.
  Liberia Democracy Pro-USA government wanted.
  Chad None Pro-USA government wanted.
  Grenada Democracy Pro-USA government wanted.
  Fiji Democracy Previous elected government supported nuclear-free Pacific.
1992-1994 Serbia Montenegro Human rights violation Divide and conquer strategy. Initiation of blockade of Serbia and Montenegro.
1993-1999 Bosnia Human rights violation Divide and conquer strategy. Jets, bombing No-fly zone patrolled in civil war; downed jets, bombed Serbs. Divide and conquer strategy.
  Serbia Human rights violation (War on Fascism) Pro-USA government wanted. Divide and conquer strategy. Bombing, missiles, heavy NATO airstrikes after Serbia declines to withdraw from Kosovo. NATO occupation of Kosovo.
  Austria War on Fascism Pro-multiculturalist government wanted. Media war with subsequent boycott is directed at Austria from the EUSSR/USASSR hegemony.
  Venezuela None Disagreed with foreign policy of elected government.
  Haiti Fraudulent elections Disagreed with economic policy of elected government.
  Georgia None Backed the Georgian government push against Russian enclaves to test out Russia’s resolve.
  Honduras Attempted to Change Constit Disagreed with economic and foreign policy of elected government.
-2010 Israel Human rights violation Disagreed with foreign policy of elected government. Israeli nationalists persecuted.


Future incidents



  France They may call it a War on Fascism? US (NATO) attempts to invade France after right wing coup?? Russia intervenes and prevents US (NATO) invasion?
  UK They may call it a War on Fascism? US (NATO) attempts to invade the UK after right wing coup?? France and Russia intervenes and prevents US (NATO) invasion?



Time will tell what the future brings. But we must be prepared for a potential US intervention and must somehow manage to get Russia to contribute as a guarantor.



Phase 3, 2070 - 2090


The US cultural Marxists/multiculturalists, suicidal humanists and capitalist globalists will do everything in their power to prevent us from deporting the Muslims living in Europe. They want to preserve European countries as the US “crown vassals” which we are today.


The globalists (lead by the US) want to preserve Europe as a stable market for their products. It is in their interest to prevent us from becoming truly sovereign. In reality this is called slavery. They want to keep us as slaves. They will therefore do everything in their power from preventing us from uniting and as we already know; Western European countries will remain broken as long as there are large Muslim enclaves (mini-Pakistan’s) in all major cities. We will be paralysed as long as the Muslims are allowed to wage low intensity warfare against us. When we attempt to deport all Muslims from Europe at one point in the future it is likely that the US will intervene and they might actually initiate bombing campaigns to prevent us from “cutting out our cancer” by; bombing our railroads, our roads and our fleet (both naval and aerial). In a way, they hope that we will initiate a genocidal campaign as it will give them the proper justification to invade us and create US military bases on European soil. Obviously, we must not allow ourselves to be manipulated like this as this is what happened in Serbia. If they bomb our transportation means we must rebuild it and try again. NATO did this as an active part of their strategy in the Balkans. They made it impossible for the Serbs to deport any Muslims and they continued to manipulate them hoping they would eventually lose all hope and start massacring Muslims.


Bombing our transportation means is one thing but there are certain strategies we will be unable to ignore;



· US bombing of our railroad tracks, our roads and our naval/aerial fleet (they hope we will begin massacre Muslims as it will give them the justification for an invasion or massive bombing campaigns (seen in Serbia vs. NATO)


· US supplying the Muslims in our country with arms and training (divide and conquer strategy, they will do what they can to provoke an overreaction/slaughter of Muslims - seen in Serbia vs. NATO)



Counter measures;


They may attempt to make it impossible for us to deport the Muslims. What can we do?


There is not much a small nation can do against the US army. This is why a single nation needs to actively consolidate and wait for other nations to join the European Federation. We all saw what they did to Serbia. What could the Serbs have done against the US army while Russia was paralysed at the time to a shift of rulers? Absolutely nothing. The US armed and trained the Muslims in Serbia (UCK) and bombed their roads, railroad tracks and their aerial fleet. Serbs do not have a coastline so there are limited means for efficient deportation methods. As they were stripped of all options, they did the only thing they could; they fought the Muslims. However, as we all know, this is exactly what NATO was waiting for and it created the justification needed to initiate massive bombing campaigns and a subsequent invasion of southern Serbia (Kosovo), in cooperation with the Islamist UCK.


It was also unfortunate timing for Serbia as it was during the inauguration of President Putin (after two terms with Boris Jeltsin in Russia). Putin lacked the political confidence at the time to intervene and help Russia’s cousin.


A single nation has to be very careful. Optimally, it should wait for other countries to join a larger alliance (European Federation) before taking any drastic steps. It should not give the US any justification to initiate bombing campaign or even launch an invasion. The UK, France and Russia have hundreds of nuclear weapons, so as soon as one these countries are liberated from multiculturalist rule (or as soon as Russia joins) it will prevent the US from intervening in such a manner.


If the US presses on and attempts to keep the UK and France as a slave nation (US cultural and economical dominance enforced by the US military is slavery), it is likely that it will backfire in the most devastating manner. Because, a people do not appreciate being slaves of another nation. They may do everything to ensure their freedom even if it involves launching 200 nukes from tactically placed submarines placed strategically outside the US east coast, inflicting massive harm on the US. Yes, the US will retaliate and annihilate that country. However, it is sometimes better to live one day as a lion than an eternity as a sheep. It is better to martyr yourself for a good cause (freedom from slavery), than to be a slave. The sacrifice that country makes is likely to prevent the US from intervening in other European countries in the future as the US East Coast will be completely devastated.


Let us hope that the US (Democratic and Republican party) allows us, their European cultural and economical crown vassals, to liberate ourselves and deport the Muslims without them militarily intervening. We shouldn’t forget that we have many allies in the US including a sizable faction of the Republican Party. There are signals that might indicate that the US will not intervene militarily after we begin liberating ourselves in the coming decades. We must continue to work close with our US allies to prevent this from happening.



Further studies:




Последнее изменение этой страницы: 2016-04-07; просмотров: 361; Нарушение авторского права страницы; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы! Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав. Обратная связь - (0.031 с.)