Заглавная страница Избранные статьи Случайная статья Познавательные статьи Новые добавления Обратная связь
Влияние общества на человека
Приготовление дезинфицирующих растворов различной концентрации
Практические работы по географии для 6 класса
Организация работы процедурного кабинета
Обработка изделий медицинского назначения многократного применения
Изменения в неживой природе осенью
Уборка процедурного кабинета
Сольфеджио. Все правила по сольфеджио
Балочные системы. Определение реакций опор и моментов защемления
Q: Do you consider yourself as an optimist as for the future of Europe?
A: I’m very optimistic. The question we must ask ourselves is; how do we defeat a self-defeating ideology? It’s rather self explanatory; cultural Marxism/ multiculturalism, especially in combination with Islam, will defeat itself. The reasoning behind this claim is that the cultural Marxist and Islamic alliance will not last. As soon as Islam reaches a few percent it begins to show signs of chauvinism which is the essence of any fascist, racist and imperialistic ideology. Muslims who follow the Quran are simply too aggressive and impatient and they will simply be unable to keep the peace for long. Ghettofication in combination with demographical warfare (which is in fact the very definition of indirect ethnic cleansing) will go hand in hand with systematical rape, ravaging, brutalisation and killing of us non-Muslims. One point in the future a window of opportunity will arise for us. Until that day comes, we must prepare, plan, recruit, arm ourselves through self education but also by acquiring weapons and armour. We must educate and enlighten as many Europeans as possible but most importantly continue the armed resistance. When that window of opportunity comes, we must be ready to seize political and military control using all means necessary. When the time comes, we must not hesitate, we must risk everything for the chance to gain our freedom and secure the freedom for our kinsmen once more.
I know I will die fighting the overwhelming cultural Marxists/multiculturalist forces in phase 1 and that’s not a problem for me at all. I have prepared mentally for a very long time and I will gladly sacrifice my life for the benefit of my European brothers and sisters. My love for them exceeds my own self serving interests. That’s not the kind of person I used to be, but it’s the type of person I have become. My hate and contempt for the cultural Marxists/multiculturalist doctrines is definitely there. However, as with most individuals, love and hate fuels us. Passion and motivation is converted into action. Some people are overwhelmed with hate or love. It’s essential that we don’t allow the passion to control us. It’s critical that we are cool and act rationally with a long term perspective. Our day will come, have no doubt about it. Just act rationally in the mean time and don’t sell your life cheaply. Make sure you have many children or fight for the armed resistance movement. You may fight with the pen or with the sword, every effort counts!
Q: Are you a religious man, and should science take priority over the teachings of the Bible?
A: My parents, being rather secular wanted to give me the choice in regards to religion. At the age of 15 I chose to be baptised and confirmed in the Norwegian State Church. I consider myself to be 100% Christian. However, I strongly object to the current suicidal path of the Catholic Church but especially the Protestant Church. I support a Church that believes in self defence and who are willing to fight for its principles and values, at least resist the efforts put forth to exterminate it gradually. The Catholic and Protestant Church are both cheering their own annihilation considering the fact that they embrace the ongoing inter-faith dialogue and the appeasement of Islam. The current Church elite has shown its suicidal face, as vividly demonstrated last year by the archbishop of Canterbury's speech contemplating the legitimacy of Shariah in parts of Britain.
I trust that the future leadership of a European cultural conservative hegemony in Europe will ensure that the current Church leadership are replaced and the systems somewhat reformed. We must have a Church leadership who supports a future Crusade with the intention of liberating the Balkans, Anatolia and creating three Christian states in the Middle East. Efforts should be made to facilitate the de-construction of the Protestant Church whose members should convert back to Catholicism. The Protestant Church had an important role once but its original goals have been accomplished and have contributed to reform the Catholic Church as well. Europe should have a united Church lead by a just and non-suicidal Pope who is willing to fight for the security of his subjects, especially in regards to Islamic atrocities.
I fully support that the Church gains more or less monopoly on religion in Europe (government policies, school curriculum etc at least) in addition to granting the Church several concessions which have been taken from them the last decades.
As for the Church and science, it is essential that science takes an undisputed precedence over biblical teachings. Europe has always been the cradle of science and it must always continue to be that way.
Regarding my personal relationship with God, I guess I’m not an excessively religious man. I am first and foremost a man of logic. However, I am a supporter of a monocultural Christian Europe.
Q: Which types of individuals and which current national political system do you admire the most?
A: As for individuals, I admire anyone who contributes to further humanity scientifically, culturally, technologically, militarily and economically. I admire individuals who act selflessly and/or contribute through personal sacrifice in one way or the other.
As for current national political systems, I especially admire the Japanese, South Korean and Taiwanese system. These three countries reject multiculturalism outright and have instead focused on maintaining and protecting their monoculture. They have managed to copy and implement the most advantageous mechanics from Europe and the US (in terms of educational, scientific, technological and economical mechanics) but have at the same time rejected cultural Marxism to a large degree. There is still room for improvement but they have managed to adapt quite well in the world and should be viewed as an inspiration for future cultural conservative governments.
Q: Any advice to a future cultural conservative tribunal/government?
A: Most aspects are already covered in the compendium. Implementing a cultural conservative agenda is essential but don’t go overboard with the changes in a short amount of time. Be patient and don’t let short term impatience or greed be your undoing. Learn from past mistakes. Sometimes it’s best to seek a gradual transformation rather than turning everything upside down too quickly. The goal is to create a long term and sustainable cultural conservative society which often will require you to make unfavourable short term concessions. Use strategic populism for what it’s worth and be careful not to rob people of too many freedoms.
Q: Which individual or organisation deserves the Nobel Peace Prize?
A:As some of us already know, the Nobel Institute is controlled by the EUSSR/USASSR criminal hegemony. I would probably award it to someone who fights hate ideologies like multiculturalism (European hate-ideology), as very few are aware of the true nature of this under-analyzed political model.
Q: Why don’t you mention the liberation of the US (from multiculturalism, suicidal humanism and Islamisation) in your book?
A:It is not our place to dictate or tell our European-American brothers and sisters what to do or not do. Whatever they decide, we Europeans will support them 100%. But of course, we are aware that they are in a somewhat similar situation. The democrats are supporting mass-Muslim immigration for the votes, while the Republicans want cheap labour. They do not have any political party at all representing them. However, we know that they are monitoring the European situation closely and are thus likely to respond based on our course of action. When the traitor government in France falls within the next seven decades it will act as a domino effect which might also result in an American right wing coup.
Последнее изменение этой страницы: 2016-04-07; Нарушение авторского права страницы
infopedia.su Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав. Обратная связь - 184.108.40.206 (0.008 с.)