Give adjectives that can characterize a good investigator. Add the list from the text above.

7. Translate into English:

Для розслідування справи слідчі та детективи використовують різні методи і засоби. Для розкриття злочину необхідно враховувати багато аспектів. Важливим завданням є збір свідчень та доказів і пошук потенційного підозрюваного. В процесі допиту свідків слідчий може отримати важливу інформацію щодо винності особи, присутності підозрюваного на місці злочина. Цей факт може бути підтверджений чи навпаки завдяки перевірці фізичних доказів. Існують спеціальні методи встановлення ідентичності особи: аналіз відбитків пальців та ДНК. Шляхом порівняння відбитків пальців на місці злочину та відбитків підозрюваного можна встановити абсолютний доказ присутності або ідентичності особи.

III. PRACTICE AND EXPERIENCE

1. To obtain testimonial evidence an investigator has to deal with different types of people. Here are some psychological types of witnesses indicated in scientific literature: 1)honest and cooperative witness; 2) silent, know-nothing, or uninterested witness; 3) hostile and deceitful witness; 4) timid or bashful witness; 5) talkative or boastful witness; 6) “under the influence” witness. [Weston and Wells, Criminal Investigation, 1985]

Try to characterize these types of witnesses. Explain why it is difficult/ easy/ necessary/ important to interrogate each type of witnesses even not interested.

Situation: you are at the scene of a crime. Explain the steps you’d take to collect evidence from a criminal case.

3. Investigator Ruse (хитрощі). React to the suspect’s words, he tries to hide the necessary information. Complete the dialogue:

- Please tell your story backward.

- I won’t do it. You ask me to do it because you want me to make a mistake.

- Mr. Stevenson, if you are innocent as you assert why not tell it? I just want to confirm your innocence. By the way what mistake do you mean?

-What would you say, we have found…

4. Give instructions to a young specialist how he should carry out an interrogation and what he shouldn’t do to get necessary information using the following key-expressions:

· to collect information (suspect: name, age, criminal history)

· to find out (a suspect, at a scene of a crime)

· to be a good listener

· to control emotions

· to hurry

· to show sympathy

· to blame society

· to be friendly

· to offer cigarettes

· to observe physical reaction

· to let the suspect tell…without interruption

· to confront with physical evidence

· to lie (physical evidence has been found…)

· to use unexpected questions

· to tell that anybody could do the same in the similar situation

Mind that there are emotional and non-emotional offenders.

IV.WRITING Prepare a report “Famous detectives in fiction”.

V. OVER TO YOU

1. An investigator is to ask and answer a lot of questions to disclose a crime and classify it. Write them out, they are beginning with:

1) who (at least 5); 2) what (at least 7); 3) where (at least 7); 4) when (3); 5) how (4); 6) with what (2); 7) why (2); 8) with whom (4); 9) how much (4).

 

Read the extract from “If Tomorrow Comes” by Sydney Sheldon and do exercises

…The seven-storey headquarters building of Interpol, the International Criminal Police Organization, is at 26 Rue Armengaud, about six miles west of Paris. The extraordinary security is mandatory, for within this building are kept the world’s most elaborate dossiers with files on two and a half million criminals.

The inspector was in his mid-forties, an attractive figure, with an intelligent face, dark hair, and shrewd brown eyes behind black horn-rimmed glasses. Seated in the office with him were detectives from England, Belgium, France and Italy.

‘Gentlemen,’ Inspector Trignant said, ‘I have received urgent requests from each of your countries for information about the rash of crimes that has recently sprung up all over Europe. Half a dozen countries have been hit by an epidemic of ingenious swindles and burglaries, in which there are several similarities. The victims are of unsavoury reputation, there is never violence involved, and the perpetrator is always a female. We have reached the conclusion that we are facing an international gang of women. We have identi-kit pictures based on the descriptions by victims and random witnesses. As you will see, none of the women in the pictures is alike. Some are blonde, some brunette. They have variously been reported as being English, French, Spanish, Italian, American – or Texan.’

Inspector Trignant pressed a switch, and a series of pictures began to appear on the wall screen. ‘Here you see an identi-kit sketch of a brunette with short hair.’ He pressed the button again. ‘Here is a young blonde with a shag cut…Here is another blonde with a perm…a brunette with a pageboy…Here is an older woman with a French twist…a young woman with blonde streaks…an older woman with a coup sauvage.’ He turned off the projector. ‘We have no idea who the gang’s leader is or where their headquarters is located. They never leave any clues behind, and they vanish like smoke rings. Sooner or later we will catch one of them, and when we do, we shall get them all. In the meantime, gentlemen, until one of you can furnish us with some specific information, I am afraid we are at a dead end…’

 

1. Answer the questions

1. Where is the building of Interpol situated?

2. What is kept in the building?

3. What kind of information did the inspector tell?

4. Who was a perpetrator of all felonies? Was ever violence involved?

5. Which conclusion have the detectives reached?

6. Were the women of the gang alike? What was their nationality?

7. Describe the women’s appearance.

8. Who is the gang’s leader?

 

2. Explain the following word-combinations:

1) at a dead end; 2) to vanish like smoke rings; 3) identi-kit pictures; 4) gang of women; 5) epidemic of burglaries; 6) female perpetrator.

3. Predict the end of the story.

 

 

Unit 4 Criminal Justice Section 1 Criminal Proceedings

I. WARMING-UP

1. Answer the following questions:

1.What are the main steps in criminal procedure?

2. What is the difference between ‘arrest’ or ‘apprehension’ and ‘detention’? (Revise Criminal Law part)

3. Why are the police officers sometimes called ‘aggressive preventive patrol’?

2. Think of the words that characterize a person before and after detention (the suspect, …).

3. Match the following English words and expressions with their Ukrainian equivalents:

1. to plead guilty 2. to acquit the defendant 3. offender’s counsel 4. to await sentencing 5. to impose a sentence 6. formal charging document 7. grand jury

a) очікувати на вирок b) адвокат правопорушника c) виправдати підсудного d) велике журі e) визнати винним f) офіційний обвинувальний документ g) винести вирок

 

4. Match the words and their transcription, read and translate the words:

1. indictment 2. issue 3. acquit 4. charge 5. trial 6. honor 7. proceedings 8. violator 9. police

Read the text to understand what information on crime investigation is of primary importance or new for you.

TEXT 3

Notes: 1) adversarial system – змагальна система процесу

2) inquisitorial system – система дізнання в кримінальному процесі

3)information - обвинувальна заява районного прокурора (the USA)

Arraignment – пред’явлення обвинувачення, притягнення до суду

Criminal Proceedings

The adversarial system is generally adopted in common law countries. On the continent of Europe among some civil law systems (i.e. those deriving from Roman law or the Napoleonic Code) the inquisitorial system may be used for some types of cases.

The adversarial system is the two-sided structure under which criminal trial courts operate that opposes the prosecution against the defense. Justice is done when the most effective adversary is able to convince the judge or jury that his or her perspective on the case is the correct one.

Crime Reported (1)

In most common-law jurisdictions the criminal process normally includes a largely uniform set of procedures and begins when the police set out to investigate a crime either because they have received a report that a crime was committed.

Pre-Arrest Investigation (2)

Further investigation takes place. This often means the police stop and question the individuals whose actions seem suspicious and other people in the area, known as field investigation, and perform other operational-search actions.

Arrest (3)

Their next action is to determine who the violator was and apprehend the individual. When a police officer has obtained a valid warrant to arrest a person, the arrest is lawful. At all stages of the criminal process including arrest, police officers must protect citizens’ constitutional rights, such as the right to remain silent and the right to be free from unreasonable searches. A criminal suspect may question the lawfulness of an arrest when it is happening.

Booking (4)

Within a reasonable time after the arrest, the accused must be taken before a magistrate and informed of the charge. After arrest the individual is taken into custody and ‘ booked’, that is the defendant's name and other relevant information about the defendant is recorded (telephone number and address, etc.), the arrest is registered and the suspect fingerprinted and photographed.

Post-Arrest Investigation (5)

The next step is in-custody investigation which involves interrogation. After in-custody investigation, the suspect is taken to a court for what is called the ‘initial bail phase’. The judge can set a certain amount of bail or free the person on his word of honor to appear for later proceedings.

The Charging Decision (6) and Filing a Complaint (7)

While the suspect is free on bail or waiting in jail for the first appearance, the police prepare a complaint against the suspect. The complaint is a document that describes the crime. It is passed to the prosecutor for a decision on whether to charge the suspect with criminal activity, and then it is submitted to the court. The court reviews the complaint to determine if there is sufficient legal basis to hold the person in custody. The magistrate may otherwise dismiss the complaint and order to release the person from custody.

First Appearance (8)

The next step is ‘initial appearance before a judge’. In minor misdemeanour cases the initial appearance may be the only one, if the defendant pleads guilty. When the charge is more serious, the accused at the initial appearance may be informed of the charges, advised of the right to counsel and the right to remain silent, warned that any statement made may be used against the suspect in court, and advised of how to seek release on bail. In some jurisdictions, including the federal courts, a plea may be entered and bail may be set at this first appearance. If the plea is not guilty, a time is set for the trial and once again bail is reconsidered or the defendant is returned to jail to await trial. If the plea is guilty and the court accepts it, the defendant is usually sent to jail to await sentencing. Many criminal cases are resolved through a "plea bargain", usually well before trial. In a plea bargain, the defendant agrees to plead guilty to one or more charges in exchange for a lesser sentence. In other jurisdictions, the suspect will not be allowed to make a plea if the offense is a felony or gross misdemeanour, and a preliminary hearing will be promptly scheduled.

Preliminary Hearing (9)

Preliminary hearing only occurs in felony offenses. A preliminary hearing is best described as a "trial before the trial" at which the judge decides, not whether the defendant is "guilty" or "not guilty," but whether there is enough evidence to force the defendant to stand trial. In reaching this decision, the judge listens to arguments from the government (through a government attorney, or "prosecutor"), and from the defendant (usually through his or her attorney). The prosecutor may call witnesses to testify, and can introduce physical evidence in an effort to convince the judge that the case should go to trial. The defence usually cross-examines the government's witnesses and calls into question any other evidence presented against the defendant, seeking to convince the judge that the prosecutor's case is not strong enough, so that the case against the defendant must be dismissed before trial.

Grand Jury Decision (10) and Filing of the Information of Indictment (11)

In some states, review by a grand jury is also required before a felony prosecution may continue.Where the grand jury system is used, the prosecutor appears before a grand jury, presenting some of the evidence and asking the grand jury to issue an indictment (a formal charging document describing in legal language the crime of which the defendant is accused). As an alternative to grand jury indictment in those jurisdictions where the grand jury system is not used, the prosecutor can issue information, a document roughly equivalent to an indictment. If the judge has determined that there is probable cause to support charges, the prosecutor will file Information in the Superior Court.

Arraignment on the Indictment or Information (12)

During the arraignment, the defendant is taken before a Superior Court and informed of the charges. At that time, the defendant will answer to the charges by pleading not guilty, guilty or no contest. At the Superior Court Arraignment the amount of bail may be reviewed (increased or decreased).

Pre-Trial Conference (13)

At a pre-trial stage the parties exchange information about the evidence and arguments they will offer at trial, they also negotiate to obtain the best possible plea for the defendant.

Trial (14)

A trial determines the question of the defendant’s guilt. The verdict of the jury is either “guilty” or “not guilty” on each charge given to the jury for determination.

Sentencing (15)

If the defendant is acquitted at trial, he is freed. If convicted, by trial or plea, the defendant is returned to court for sentence. At sentencing the judge listens to whatever the offender of the offender’s counsel wishes to say, and ordinarily requests a sentence recommendation from the prosecutor. The judge then imposes sentence on the convicted person.

Appeal (16)

After conviction of a crime, the defendant has a right to appellate proceeding which may be available to determine whether all substantive and procedural law issues were properly conducted at the trial.

II. COMPREHENSION

1. A. Answer the following questions using the information from the text:

1. What is the starting point of the criminal process?

2. What does ‘booking a suspect’ include?

3. What is a complaint?

4. What is the defendant informed of at ‘first appearance’?

5. What does the judge decide at preliminary hearing?

6. What is the role of the jury at different stages of criminal process?

7. At which stage(s) does the defendant plead?

8. What does a trial determine?

9. What is ‘appeal’?

 

B. Give the definitions for the following terms and expressions or explain them in other words:

- to release / free on bail;

- trial;

- sentence;

- to book a suspect;

- to charge;

- to convict;

- to acquit

- plea;

- information.

 

2. Complete the following sentences according to the information from the text:

1. After arrest the suspect is usually taken ….

2. Booking means recording all the information about the suspect, ….

3. The suspect may be released on bail or freed on….

4. While the suspect is waiting in jail, the police reports are passed on to the prosecutor for….

5. The prosecutor presents some evidence to the grand jury and the grand jury is to….

6. If the defendant pleads guilty he is….

7. A person is called convicted after….

8. Trial is a stage of a criminal process when…

9. ‘A person is acquitted’ means that a person is found…by….

3. Use the information from the text and choose the right item to complete the sentences:

1. In fact the criminal process starts from the

a) preliminary hearing;

b) crime reported;

c) booking a suspect.

2. When a suspect is fingerprinted and photographed it means that a suspect is

a) interrogated;

b) booked;

c) charged.

3. A formal charging document by the grand jury describing the crime of which the defendant is accused is called

a) information;

b) charge;

c) indictment.

4. After the defendant is charged with a specific crime he is asked to

a) plead charges;

b) to accept charges;

c) to listen to the sentence.

5. A person may be convicted either by a judge or by his

a) a juror;

b) plea;

c) the prosecutor.

4. Draw up a scheme of a criminal justice process giving your own names of criminal procedure stages and starting with the following:

1. crime reported

16.

…

5. In Ex.4 you were to draw up a scheme of criminal procedure. In this test we will look at what happens at each typical stage. Read the definitions below and name the steps of criminal procedure:

a) the police free the person alleged to have committed the crime on condition that the accused appears at court at a future date;

b) the police arrest the person who is alleged to have committed a crime;

c) the police carry out a detailed enquiry into the alleged crime;

d) the police receive information that a crime may have been committed;

e) the accused comes to court to face charges;

f) the defendant is found not guilty of the charge;

g) the defendant is found guilty and convicted of a crime;

h) the defendant pleads guilty;

i) the defendant swears that he is innocent;

j) the judge decides punishment;

k) the accused is detained and stays in jail;

l) the accused is taken into custody, and all relevant information about him is recorded;

m) a jury or prosecutor issues a formal charging document describing the crime of which the defendant is accused;

n) the determination of an accused person’s guilt or innocence after hearing evidence for the prosecution and for the accused and the judicial examination of the issues involved.

6. Fill in the table with the words or sentences that can go with the following the stages of criminal procedure:

Bail	Trial	Crime Reported	Appeal	arrest	Preliminary hearing

III. VOCABULARY STUDY

1. Choose and read the words that best complete the sentences:

1. If the defendant pleads guilty he is sent to jail to await verdict/ sentencing.

2. After conviction a person has a right to charge/ to appeal.

3. When the charges are read the defendant is asked to consider/ plead them.

4. Indictment describes the verdict/ the crime of which the defendant is accused.

5. A suspect may be freed on plea/ bail.

2. Choose the right preposition in brackets according to the contents of the sentences (before, with, into, on, on, from):

1. After arrest a person is usually taken … custody.

2. The suspect is interrogated and then brought … a judge.

3. A person may be freed … his word of honour or … bail.

4. You know, famous Dr. Stivenson is charged … murder!

5. The judge requested a sentence recommendation … the prosecutor.

3. Substitute the words in italics with the words from the active vocabulary:

1. A person who is brought before a court of law may be convicted or acquitted.

2. Declaration in a law court that a person is guilty is followed by judge’s sentence.

3. The judge imposes his decision as for the punishment, and the defendant has a right to appeal.

4. The body of persons who passed on a verdict found the offender not guilty.

5. A formal charging document by grand jury is to be issued after a prosecutor presents some evidence to the jury.

6. A formal charging document by a prosecutor is issued in those jurisdictions where the grand jury system is not used.

4. The verbs below can all be used to form nouns. Find in the text the words which have related meanings and make up your own sentences with them. Pay special attention to where the stress is .

Example:: To violate – a violator (n.) e.g. One of the tasks of investigation is to determine who the violator was.

To investigate, to record, to interrogate, to charge, to convict, to sentence, to hear, to try, to acquit, to appeal, to recommend, to plead

5. Give the English equivalents for the following word combinations:

Визнати себе винним, бути виправданим, засуджений злочинець, винести вирок, видати обвинувальний висновок великого журі, посадити до в’язниці, винести офіційне обвинувачення проти підозрюваного, затримати особу, звільнити під заставу.