Military and financial assistance to Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad 

Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!


Military and financial assistance to Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad


Iranians by nearly two-to-one approve their government providing
"military and financial assistance" to each of three militant terrorist groups in the region:


"Lebanese Hezbollah" (Support: 61% vs. Oppose 32%)


"Hamas and Islamic Jihad" (Support: 61% vs. Oppose 32%)

Should Iran create nuclear weapons?


Support: 51% vs. Oppose 39%)









Muslim population in European prisons [11]

Estimating the percentages of Muslims in prisons across Europe is not simple. In some cases, such as Sweden, collecting such data is illegal. In many cases, the numbers are only estimates.

I linked to some sources, but note that not all sources have the same reliability level. EUMAP - EU Research program[1], NEWS - mentioned in the news.



Belgium - 16% (12.8% Moroccans, 3.1% Turks) [2], 35% [3]


(The real numbers are most likely 30-60%)

Denmark - 20% [4] (The real numbers are most likely 30-60%)

England+Wales - 11% [5] (The real numbers are most likely 30-60%)

France - 50%-70% [6]

Germany - 18% foreigners, lowest estimate for Muslims - 5% [7] (The real numbers are most likely 30-60%)

Italy - 40% foreigners, 8% Moroccans [8] (The real numbers are most likely 30-60%)

The Netherlands: 20%, youth prisons - 26% [9] (The real numbers are most likely 30-60%)

Spain - 70% [10]


Norway – 40%+ [12] (The real numbers are most likely 40-60%)


















Muhammad is the most popular name in many European cities/countries for new born males



- Italy, Milan[1]

- Sweden, Malmø[2]

- Norway, Oslo[3]

- Belgium, Brussels[4]

- UK (whole country)

- Marseilles

- Amsterdam

- Stockholm



Variations of Muhammad:



Mohammed Muhammed Mohammad Muhammad Mohamed Mohamad Muhamad Mahamed Mahommed Mahammed Mohammod Muhammod Mohmmed Mohamud Mohammud Mehmed Mehmet (Turkish) Mahomet Mahoma (Spanish) Maxamed Mahmud Ahmed Hamid al-Hamid



Names in italic are variations of Muhammad but are not usually included by EU governments.







3. - -



Europe today



“We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.”


Ayn Rand



“The root of Europe's problems is the lack of cultural self-confidence (nationalism). Most people are still terrified of nationalistic political doctrines thinking that if we ever embrace these principles again, new “Hitler’s” will suddenly pop up and initiate global armageddon. Needless to say; the growing numbers of nationalists in Europe are systematically being ridiculed, silenced and persecuted by the current cultural Marxist/multiculturalist political establishments.


This irrational fear of nationalistic doctrines is preventing us from stopping our own national/cultural suicide as the hordes of Islam is increasing annually.“



2.54 Europe’s Decline – Hurrah! We Capitulate!


By Fjordman


This story is extremely serious. The European Union is now about to do what senior officials have already agreed upon years ago in meetings with Muslim nations, as documented by Bat Ye'or in her book about Eurabia[1]: To officially recognise sharia law[2] in European countries:



A quote from the Gates of Vienna blog, 16 September 2008[3]



Muslims living in EU countries will in the future be able to divorce according to sharia law. This is the belief of the EU Commission, which recommends that a couple be able to choose which country's law they will follow if they divorce — as long as they have some kind of connection to the country they choose. Because of Danish opt-out provisions, the EU regulation will not have a direct impact on Denmark. But Danish People's Party EU spokesman Morten Messerschmidt is still greatly concerned about the proposal: "It's a completely lamebrain idea, the possibility that the Commission will use inhumane sharia laws in the EU," he says to MetroXpress.


A quote from Serge Trifkovic at the Chronicles Magazine blog, 16 September 2008[4]



British papers are reporting that shari'a law has been officially adopted in Britain[5], with shari'a courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases, notably including wife beating. Gordon Brown's Labour government "has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence." Particularly alarming is the fact that Islamic rulings are now enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court. […]

Contrary to the Christian concept of governmental legitimacy (Romans 13:1), Islam condemns as rebellion against Allah's supremacy the submission to any other form of law (Kuran, 5:50). Muslims believe that Shari'a should be used as a standard test of validity of all positive laws. Christ recognised the realm of human government as legitimate when he said, "Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's" (Matthew 22:21). In Islam there is no such distinction between church and state. Shari'a is not at all a "religious law" but a blend of political theory and penal law that relies for the punishment of violators on the sword of the state. To be legitimate, all political and legal power must rest with those who obey Allah's authority and his revealed will sent down through his prophet (Kuran 5:59). Shari'a applies to all humankind just as Kuran applies to all creation. Any law that is inconsistent with it is null and void, not only to the Muslims, but to all humanity. Jews, Christians, and pagans are subject to Shari'a, too, and from Muhammad's standpoint they cannot invoke the judgments and moral principles of prior revelations (4:60). Resort to any other source of authority is not only unjustified, it is satanic. The non-Muslims are to be judged by the laws of Islam in everything, "whether they like it or not, whether they come to us or not."Shari'a stands above reason, conscience, or nature. Its lack of any pretense to moral basis is explicit: there is no "spirit of the law" in Islam, no discernment of the consequences of deeds. The revelation and tradition must not be questioned or any other standard of judgment – least of all any notion of "natural" justice inherent to men as such – can be invoked, let alone applied (5:45).













Последнее изменение этой страницы: 2016-04-07; просмотров: 427; Нарушение авторского права страницы; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы! Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав. Обратная связь - (0.011 с.)