Distributed Control System (DCS) History

from Wikipedia

 

Early minicomputers were used in the control of industrial processes since the beginning of the 1960s. The IBM 1800, for example, was an early computer that had input/output hardware to gather process signals in a plant for conversion from field contact levels (for digital points) and analog signals to the digital domain.

The first industrial control computer system was built 1959 at the Texaco Port Arthur, Texas, refinery with an RW-300 of the Ramo-Wooldridge Company.

The DCS was introduced in 1975. Both Honeywell and Japanese electrical engineering firm Yokogawa introduced their own independently produced DCSs at roughly the same time, with the TDC 2000 and CENTUM systems, respectively. US-based Bristol also introduced their UCS 3000 universal controller in 1975. In 1978 Metso (known as Valmet in 1978) introduced their own DCS system called Damatic (latest generation named Metso DNA). In 1980, Bailey (now part of ABB) introduced the NETWORK 90 system. Also in 1980, Fischer & Porter Company (now also part of ABB) introduced DCI-4000 (DCI stands for Distributed Control Instrumentation).

The DCS largely came about due to the increased availability of microcomputers and the proliferation of microprocessors in the world of process control. Computers had already been applied to process automation for some time in the form of both Direct Digital Control (DDC) and Set Point Control. In the early 1970s Taylor Instrument Company, (now part of ABB) developed the 1010 system, Foxboro the FOX1 system and Bailey Controls the 1055 systems. All of these were DDC applications implemented within minicomputers (DEC PDP-11, Varian Data Machines, MODCOMP etc.) and connected to proprietary Input/Output hardware. Sophisticated (for the time) continuous as well as batch control was implemented in this way. A more conservative approach was Set Point Control, where process computers supervised clusters of analog process controllers. A CRT-based workstation provided visibility into the process using text and crude character graphics. Availability of a fully functional graphical user interface was a way away.

Central to the DCS model was the inclusion of control function blocks. Function blocks evolved from early, more primitive DDC concepts of "Table Driven" software. One of the first embodiments of object-oriented software, function blocks were self-contained "blocks" of code that emulated analog hardware control components and performed tasks that were essential to process control, such as execution of PID algorithms. Function blocks continue to endure as the predominant method of control for DCS suppliers, and are supported by key technologies such as Foundation Fieldbus today.

Midac Systems of Sydney Australia developed an objected-oriented distributed direct digital control system in 1982. The central system ran 11 microprocessors sharing tasks and common memory and connected to a serial communication network of distributed controllers each running two Z80s. The system was installed at the University of Melbourne.

Digital communication between distributed controllers, workstations and other computing elements (peer to peer access) was one of the primary advantages of the DCS. Attention was duly focused on the networks, which provided the all-important lines of communication that, for process applications, had to incorporate specific functions such as determinism and redundancy. As a result, many suppliers embraced the IEEE 802.4 networking standard. This decision set the stage for the wave of migrations necessary when information technology moved into process automation and IEEE 802.3 rather than IEEE 802.4 prevailed as the control LAN.

URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_Control_System

 

3. Find out the English equivalents for the following word combinations:

Ввести особые функции; соответственно; благодаря; распределительные регуляторы; а также и; компьютерные системы управления.

 

4. Translate the following word combinations:

Object-oriented software; a serial communication network; distributed controllers; input/output hardware; at roughly the same time; DCI stands for; the proliferation of microprocessors; direct digital control; for some time; attention duly focused on, the system runs microprocessors.

 

5. Find the English equivalents given in (b) for the word combinations in (a):

a) 1. вместо; 2. несмотря на; 3. в результате; 4. более или менее; 5. на самом деле; 6. благодаря; 7. а также и; 8.по крайней мере; 9. между прочим; 10. рассматриваемый; 11. в свою очередь; 12. то есть; 13. до сих пор; 14. скорее чем.

b) 1. by the way; 2. in question; 3. at least; 5. so far; 6. that is to say; 7. as a result; 8. due to; 9. more or less; 10. in one’s turn; 11. in spite of; 12. as a matter of fact; 13.rather than; 14. as well as.

 

6. Form nouns from the following verbs:

To communicate, to apply, to achieve, to require, to develop, to move, to implement, to introduce, to discover, to know, to observe, to protect, to embody, to experience, to begin, to introduce, to perform, to evolve, to convert, to control.

 

7. Translate the text and write down the terms