Билет 13 I.Composite sentence as a polypredicative unit.

The composite sentence is a general term for all types of sentences with more than one predicative line. Composite sentence in which clauses are subordinated to one another is called a complex sentence. Composite sentence with coordinated clauses is termed as a compound sentence.The composite sentence in general is formed by 2 or more predicative lines as different from the simple sentence. Composite sentence is a polypredicative construction which reflects 2 or more elementary situations making up a unity. Each predicative unit in a composite sentence makes up a clause. This clause corresponds to a separate sentence but is not equivalent to it. Let’s consider the following sentence: When she entered the hall the party was in full swing. It includes 2 clauses which correspond to the following sentences: She entered the hall. The party was in full swing.

The logical difference between the composite sentence and the sequence of simple sentences is in the purpose of communication. The independent sentences are utterances each expressing an event of self-sufficient significance. The communicative purpose of the sentence discussed is to inform of the fact that “the party was in full swing” and is destroyed in a sequence of simple sentences. Thus, we see that the composite sentence, as a particular structural unit of language is remarkable for its own purely semantic merits, it exposes the genuine logic of events making up a situational unity. The fact proves the unity of the 2 predicative units within the composite sentence. The composite sentence including no more than 2 predicative lines is called elementary. Composite sentence displays 2 principal types of clause connection: hypotaxis – that of subordination and parataxis – that of coordination. It’s remarkable that the initial rise of hypotaxis and parataxis as forms of composite sentences can be traced back to the early stages of language development, i.e. to the times when the language had no writing. The illustrations of the said syntactic relations are contained, for example, in the old English epic “Beowulf”, dated from the VII c. A.D. Subordination is revealed between clauses of unequal rank, one of them being dominated by the other. From the structural point of view it means that one clause, the dominated or subordinate one, is in a notional position of the other clause (which is a principal one). It means that a subordinate clause refers to one notional constituent (expressed by a word or a phrase) in a principal clause. From the communicative point of view a subordinate clause renders the information which is additional to that of the principal clause. Coordination is observed between the syntactically equal sentences, e.g.:Soon he left the house and I followed him. Ranking of clauses into equal or unequal comes from their relation to one another. A sequential clause in a composite sentence with coordination refers to the whole of the leading clause. It is due to this fact that the position of a coordinate clause is rigidly fixed in all cases. As for the composite sentences with subordination a subordinate clause usually refers to one notional constituent in a principal clause, e.g.: I would never believe the silly fact that he had been under her influence. There are two general ways of combining clauses into a sentence. They are syndetic (conjunctional) and asyndetic (non-conjunctional). According to the traditional point of view all composite sentences are classed into compound sentences and complex sentences, syndetic or asyndetic type of clause connection being specifically displayed with both classes. Consider the following examples: compound sent. As. The day was hot, we felt exhausted. Syn. I was extremely disappointed, but she never noticed it complex sent. with attributive clause: as. That was a fantastic show (which) I remembered forever. with objective clauses: We realized at once (that) it was a strong argument. with p redicative clauses: The news is (that) she did leave the city.