Judicial review in European Union law: liber amicorum in honour of Lord Slynn of Iladley. Volume 1. / Ed. O'Keeffe D., Bavasso A. - The Hague, New York: Kluwer Law International, 2001. - 674 p.

Kadelbach S. Union Citizenship // Jean Monnet Working Paper. - 2003. - Vol. 9.-56 p.

308. Kaleda S. L. Extension ofthe preliminary rulings procedure outside the scope of Community law: "The Dzodzi line of eases" // European Integration Online Papers. - 2000. - Vol. 4, No. 11.- Режим доступу: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/ texte/2000-01 a.htm.

Kcnney SJ. The Members ofthe Court of Justice ofthe European Communities // Columbia Journal of European Law. - 1998-1999. - Vol. 5. - P. 101-133.

Kilbey I. Financial Penalties Under Article 228 (2) EC: Excessive Complexity? // Common Market Law Review. - 2007. - Vol. 44. - P. 743-759.

Killias L. The Lugano Convention and Its Relevance for Arbitration // European Journal of Law Reform. - 2002. - Vol. 4, No. 1.--P. 119-133.

Klamert M. Judicial Implementation of Directives and Anticipatory Indirect Effect: Connecting the Dots // Common Market Law Review. - 2006. - Vol. 43.-P. 1251-1275.

313. Koch C. Commission ofthe European Communities v Jego-Quere & Cic SA // American Journal of International Law. - 2004. - Vol. 98, No. 4. - P. 814-819.

Koch C. Locus Standi on Private Applicants under the EU Constitution: Preserving Gaps in the Protection of Individuals' Right to an Effective Remedy Koch // European Law Review. - 2005. - Vol. 30, No. 4. - P. 511-527.

Komarck J. Federal Elements in the Community Judicial System: Building Coherence in the Community Legal Order// Common Market Law Review. -2005. - Vol. 42. - P. 9-34.

Komarek J. In the Court(s) We Trust? On the Need for Hierarchy and Differentiation in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure // European Law Review. -2007. - Vol. 32, No. 4. - P. 467-491.

317. Komninos A. P. Article 234 EC and National Competition Authorities in the Era of Decentralization II European Law Review. - 2004. - Vol. 29, No 1. -P. 106-114.

Koopmans T. The Future ofthe Court of Justice of the European Communities // Yearbook of European Law. - 1991. - Vol. 11. - P. 15-29.

319. Kotz H. Civil Justice System in Europe and the United States // Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law. - 2003. - Vol. 13, No. 3. - P. 61-76.

KovarR. Chronique de la jurisprudence de la Courdejustice des Communautcs europeennes // Journal de Droit International. - 1965. - Vol. 93. - P. 697-717.

Kracmer H. The European Union Civil Service Tribunal: a New Community Court Examined after Four Years of Operation // Common Market Law Review. - 2009. - Vol. 46. - P. 1873-1913.

322 Krummel Т., D'sa R. Implementation by German Courts of the Jurisprudence ofthe European Court of Justice on State Liability for Breach of Community Law as Developed in Francovich and Subsequent Cases // European Bisiness Law Review. - 2009. - P. 273-286.

Kiilin Z. The Application of European Law in the New Member States: Several (Early) Predictions // German Law Journal. - 2005. - Vol. 6, No. 3. - P. 563-582.

Kumm M. The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty // European Law Journal. - 2005. - Vol. 11, No. 3. - P. 262-307.

325. LafTan B. Become a "Living Institution": The Evolution ofthe European Court of Auditors // Journal of Common Market Studies. - 1999. - Vol. 37. - P. 251-268.

Lage S. M., Brokclmann H. The Liability ofthe Spanish State for Breach of EC Law: the Landmark Ruling of Spanish Tribunal Supremo in the Canal Satelit? Digital Case // European Law Review. - 2004. - Vol. 29, No. 4. - P. 530-545.

Lang T. Actions for declarations that Community Regulations are invalid: The duties of national courts under Article 10 EC // European Law Review. -2003. - Vol. 28, No. 5. - P. 102-111.

Lanni A. The Future of Community Justice // Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review. - 2005. - Vol. 40. - P. 359-405.

329. Lasok D. Law and Institutions ofthe European Union. - [6^Л EdJ. - London, Dublin, Edinburgh: Butterworths, 1994. -cxi, 786 p.

Lasser M. Anticipating Three Models of Judicial Control, Debate and Legitimacy: The European Court of Justice, the Cour de cassation and the United States Supreme Court // Jean Monnct Working Paper. - 2003. - Vol. 1. - 56 p.

Lavranos N. The New Specialized Courts Within the European Judicial System // European Law Review. - 2005. - Vol. 30, No. 2. - P. 261-272.

Lavranos N. The Scope ofthe Exclusive Jurisdiction ofthe Court of Justice // European Law Review. - 2007. - Vol. 32, Is. I. - P. 83-94.

333. Lefevre S. The Interpretation of Community Law by the Court of Justice in Areas of National Competence // European Law Review. - 2004. - Vol. 29, No. 4. -P. 501-516.

334. Lefevre S. Interpretative Communications and the Implementation of Community Law at National Level // European Law Review. - 2004. - Vol. 29, No. 6. - P. 808-822.

335. Lenaerts K., Vanhamme J. Procedural Rights of Private Parties in the Community Administrative Process // Common Market Law Review. - 1997. -Vol. 34.-P. 531-569.

336. Lenaerts K„ Arts D. Procedural Law ofthe European Union. - London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1999. -exxviii, 539 p.

337. Lenaerts K. Respect for Fundamental Rights as Constitutional Principle of the European Union // Columbia Journal of European Law. - 2000. - Vol. 6.-P. 1-25.

338. Lenaerts K. The Rule of Law and the Coherence ofthe Judicial System ofthe European Union // Common Market Law Review. - 2007. - Vol. 44. - P. 1625-1659.

339. Lcnz M. Horizontal what? Back to Basics // European Law Review. - 2000. -Vol. 25, Is. 5. - P. 509-522.

340. Lew J., Mistelis L., Kroll S. Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. - The Hague, London, New York: Kluwer Law International, 2003.-xxxv, 953 p.

341. Lubbers M. Regarding the Dutch Nee' to the European Constitution: A Test ofthe Identity, Utilitarian and Political Approaches to Voting 'No'//European Union Politics. - 2008. - Vol. 9, No. 1. - P. 59-86.

342. Loof R. Temporal Aspects ofthe Duty of Consistent Interpretation in the First and Third Pillars // European Law Review. - 2007. - Vol. 32, Is. 6. - P. 888-895.

343. Malcolm R. Beyond Francovich I/ Modem Law Review. - 1993. - Vol. 56, Is. l.-P. 55-73.

344. Malcshin D. The Russian Style ofCivil Procedure// Emory International Law Review. - 2007. - Vol. 21, No. 2. - P. 543-562.

345. Mancini F. G. The Making of a Constitution for Europe // Common Market Law Review. - 1989. - Vol. 26. - P. 596-614.

346. Mancini F. G„ Keeling D. T. From CILFIT to ERT: the Constitutional Challenge facing the European Court//Yearbook of European Law. - 1991. -Vol. 1 l.-P. 1-13.

347. Mancini G. F., Keeling D. Democracy and the European Court of Justice // Modern Law Review. - 1994. - Vol. 57. - P. 175-190.

348. Mancini G. F., Keeling D. T. Language, Culture and Politics in the Life ofthe European Court of Justice // Columbia Journal of European Law. - 1995. -Vol. I, No. 2.-P. 397-413.

349. Manin Ph. The Treaty ofAmsterdam // Columbia Journal ofEuropean Law. -

1998. - Vol.4. - P. 1-26.

350. Martin A. M, Nogueras D. J. L. Instituciones у derecho de la Union Europea. -
Madrid: Tecnos Editorial, 1996. - 656 p.

351 Mather J. D. The Court of Justice and the Union Citizen // European Law Journal. - 2005. - Vol. 11, No. 6. - P. 722-743.

352 Mbaye H. Why National States Comply with Supranational Law. Explaining Implementation Infringements in European Union, 1972-1993 // European Union Politics. - 2001. - Vol. 2, Issue 3. - P. 259-281.

353 Mischo J. Un role nouveau pour la Cour de Justice? // Revue du Marchc Commun. - 1990. - No. 342. - P. 681-686.

354. Monar J. Justice and Home Affairs in the Treaty of Amsterdam: Reform at the Price of Fragmentation // European Law Review. - 1998. - Vol. 23, Is. 4. - P. 320-335.

355 Munoz R. The Monitoring of the Application of Community Law: The Need to Improve the Current Tools and an Obligation to Innovate // Jean Monnet Working Paper. - 2006. - № 4. - 51 p.

356. Nascimbcne B. Community Courts in the Area of Judicial Cooperation // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. - 2005. - Vol. 54. - P. 489-497.

357 Nazzini R. Parallel and Sequential Proceedings in Competition Law: An Essay on the Modes of Interaction between Community and National Law // European Business Law Review. - 2005. - Vol. 16, Is. 2 - P. 245-273.

358. Neill P. The European Court of Justice: A Case Study in Judicial Activism // European Policy Forum. - 1995.

359. Nemitz P.F. General Report on State Aid "The effective application of EU state aid procedure: from a plan to grant aid to the recovery of illegal aid - the role of national law and practice" // FIDE Congress. - Cyprus, 1 -4 November, 2006.

360. Neuwahl N. Article 173 Paragraph 4 EC: Past, Present and Possible Future // European Law Review. - 1996. - Vol. 21. - P. 17-31.

-_fi1 Nicholas E. State liability under Community law: shedding more light on the Francovich principle? // European Law Review. - 1996. - Vol. 21, Is. 5. - P. 399-411.

-,, Ninatti S. How Do Our Judges Conceive of Democracy? The Democratic Nature of the Community Decision-Making Process Under Scrutiny of the European Court of Justice // Jean Monnet Working Paper. - 2003. - Vol. 10. - 53 p.

-,- Nordberg C. Judicial Remedies for Private Parties under the State Aid Procedures // Legal Issues of European Integration. - 1997. - Vol. 24, No. l.-P. 35-77.

364 Obermaier A. J. The National Judiciary—Sword ofEuropean Court of Justice
Rulings: The Example of the Kohll/Decker Jurisprudence // European Law
Journal. - 2008. -Vol. 14, No. 6. - P. 735-752.

365 0'^{Kccfe D}- Appeals Against an Order to Refer under Article 177 of the EEC
' Treaty // European Law Review. - 1984. - Vol. 9. - P. 87-104.

366. Oliver P. Limitation of Actions before the European Court // European Law Review. - 1978,-Vol. 3.-P. 3-13.

367. Olsen E. D. H. The origins ofEuropean citizenship in the first two decades of European integration // Journal ofEuropean Public Policy. - 2008. - Vol. 15, Is. 1. - P. 40-57.

368 Papaioannou A. // Common Market Law Review. - 1994. - Vol. 31. - P. 155-164.

Pernice I. Integrating the Charter of Fundamental Rights into the Constitution of the European Union: Practical and Theoretical Propositions // Columbia Journal of European Law. - 2003. - Vol. 10. - P. 5-47.