Favoreu L. Les Constitutions nationals face au droit europeen // Revue frangaise dc droit constitutionnel. - 1996. - No. 28. - P. 699-729.

Festschrift fiir Ulrich Everting. Vol. 2. / Eds. Due O., Lutter M., Schwarze J. -Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1995. - 1239 p.

247. Figucroa Rcguciro P. V. Invocability of Substitution and Invocability of Exclusion: Bringing Legal Realism to the Current Developments of the Case-Law of "Horizontal" Direct Effect of Directives // Jean Monnet Working Paper. - 2002. - Vol. 7. - 64 p.

248. Fletcher M. Some Developments to поп bis in idem Principle in the European Union: Criminal Proceedings Against Huseyn Groziitok and Klaus Brugge // Modern Law Review. - 2003. - Vol. 66, Is. 5 - P. 769-780.

249. Fletcher M. Extending "Indirect Effect" to the Third Pillar: the Significance of Pupino // European Law Review. - 2005. - Vol. 30, No. 6. - P. 862-877.

Forwood N. The European Court of Justice - the Need for Change in the Changing World // Liverpool Law Review. - 2001. - Vol. 23. - P. 231-247.

251. Fossum J. E., Mcncndez A. J. The Constitution's Gift? A Deliberative Democratic Analysis of Constitution Making in the European Union // European Law Journal. - 2005. - Vol. 11, No. 4^Л - P. 380-410.

252. Frcudenthal M. The Future of European Civil Procedure // Electronic Journal of Comparative Law. - 2003. - Vol. 7.5. - Режим доступу: http://www.ejcl. org/ej cl/75/art75-6.htmI.

Fries S., Shaw J. Citizenship of the Union: First Steps in the European Court of Justice // European Public Law. - 1998. - Vol. 4. - P. 533-559.

254. Galanter M. Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Changes // Law and Society Review. - 1974. - Vol. 9. - P. 95-160.

Garbagnati Ketvel M.-G. The Jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Respect of the Common Foreign and Security Policy // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. - 2006. - Vol. 55. - P. 77-120.

Garrett G., Kclcmen R.D., Schulz H. The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union // International Organization. - 1998.-Vol. 52, Issue l.-P. 149-176.

Garcia R.A. The General Provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union // European Law Journal. - 2002. - Vol. 8, No. 4. - P. 492-514.

Garcia R.A. The General Provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union // Jean Monnet Working Paper. - New York, 2002. - № 4.-32 p.

Gasparon P. The Transposition of the Principle of Member State Liability into the Context of External Relations //European Journal of International Law. -1999. - Vol. 10, No. 3. - P. 605-624.

Gcimer R. The Brussels Convention - Successful Model and Old-timer // European Journal of Law Reform. - 2002. - Vol. 4, No. 1. - P. 19-34.

Giannakopoulos T. The Right to Bring an Action before the European Courts against the Various Decisions of the Commission in State Aid Cases // Journal ofWorld Competition. - 2000. - Vol. 23, No. 3. - P. 81-102.

Gibson J.L., Caldeira G.A. Changes in the Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice: A Post-Maastricht Analysis// British Journal of Political Science. -1998.-Vol. 28.-P. 63-91.

Golub J. The Politics of Judicial Discretion: Rethinking the Interaction Between National Courts and the European Court of Justice // West European Politics. - 1996. - Vol. 19, No. 2. - P. 360-385.

Granger M.-P. F. When Governments Go to Luxembourg...The Influence of Governments on the Court of Justice // European Law Review. - 2004. - Vol. 29, No. I.- P. 3-31.

Greaves R. Locus Standi under Article 173 EEC when Seeking Annulment of a Regulation // European Law Review. - 1986. - Vol. 11,- P. 119-133.

Greer S., Williams A. human Rights in the Councal of Europe and the El): Towards 'Individual', 'Constitutional' or 'Institutional' Justice? // European Law Journal. 2009. - Vol. 15, No. 4. - P. 462-481.

Gramm D. The European Court of Justice and Natiknal Courts: the German Constitutional Perspectives after the Maastricht Decision // Columbia Journal of European Law. - 1)97. - Vol. 3. - P. 229-242.

268. Hanf D. Facilitading Private Applicants' Access to the European Courts? On the Possible Impact of the CFI's Ruling in Jego - Quere II German Law Journal - 2002. - Vol. 3, No. 7. - Режим доступу: http://www.genrianlawjournal. com/past_issues.php?id= 166.

Harding C. The Private Interest in Challenging Community Action // European Law Review. - 1980. - Vol. 5. - P. 354-361.

I larding С The Impact of Art. 177 of the EEC Treaty on the Review of Community Action //Yearbook ofEuropean Law. - 1981. - Vol. 1. - P. 93-113.

Harden I., White S., Donnelly K. The Court of Auditors and Financial Control and Accountability in the European Community // European Public Law. -1995.-Vol. l.-P. 599-632.

Harden I. What Future forthe Centralised Enforcement Machinery ofCommunity Law? // Current Legal Problems. - 2002. - Vol. 55. - P. 495-514.

Harlow C. Towards a Theory of Access for the European Court of Justice // Yearbook ofEuropean Law. - 1992. - Vol. 12. - P. 213-248.

Harlow C. Francovich and the Problem of the Disobedient State // European Law Journal. - 1996. - Vol. 2. - P. 204-210.

Hartley Т. С International Agreements and the Community Legal System: Some Recent Development // European Law Review. - 1983. - Vol. 8. - P. 383-392.

Hartley Т. С Constitutional Problems of the European Union. - Oxford, Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 1999. - 224 p.

Hattan E. Implementation ofEU environmental law//Journal ofEnvironmental Law. - 2003. - Vol. 15, No. 3. - P. 273-288.

278. Hatzopoulos V. With or without you... judging politically in the field of Area of Freedom, Security and Justice // European Law Review. - 2008. - Vol. 33, Is. 1. - P. 44-65.

279. Hayes-Renshaw F., Wallace H. The Council of Ministers. - [2'^b edJ. - London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1997. - 392 p.

Hazard J. C, Taruffo M., Stiirner R., Gidi A. Introduction to the Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure // International Law and Politics. -Vol. 88.-2001.-P. 769-784.

Hedemann-Robinson M. Article 228(2) EC and the Enforcement of EC Environmental Law: A Case of Environmental Justice Delayed and Denied? An Analysis of Recent Legal Developments // European Environmental Law Review. - 2006. - Vol. 15, Issue 11. - P. 312-342.

Ней В. The Integrating Effect of European Civil Procedure Law // European Journal of Law Reform. - 2002. - Vol. 4, No. I. - P. 3-17. - P. 3.

283. High-speed Internet: the Commission imposes a fine on Wanadoo for abuse of a dominant position // Press Release IP/03/1025. - 2003. - Режим досту­пу: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleascsAction.do?reference=IP/03/1025&f ormat=HTML&aged= 1 &language=EN&guiLanguagc=en.

Hilson C. What's in a Right? The Relationship Between Community, Fundamental and Citizenship Rights in EU Law // European Law Review. -2004. - Vol. 29, Issue 5. - P. 636-651.

Hofmann H. Legislation, Delegation and Implementation under the Treaty of Lisbon: Typology Meets Reality // European Law Journal. - 2009. - Vol. 15, No. 4. - P. 482-505.

Horspool M., Humphreys M., Harris S., Malcolm R. European Union Law. -New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. - 558 p.

287. Houtman A. Le Droit de la Defense dans les Procedures en Matiere d'Aidcs d'Etat. - Brusscl, 25 October 1996. - Режим доступу: http://curopa.eu.int/ comm/dg04/speech/six/cn/sp96058.htm.

Inghelram J. The European Court of Auditors. Current Legal Issues // Common Market Law Review. - 2000. - Vol. 37. - P. 129-146.

289. Institutional Dynamics of European Integration: Essays in Honour of Henry G. Schermers / [T. Kuile, D. Curtin, T. Hcukels and others]. - Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994. - 715 p.

Jaaskincn N. The Application of Community Law in Finland: 1995-1998 // Common Market Law Review. - 1999. - Vol. 36. - P. 407-441.

Jacobs F.G. Human Rights in the European Union: the Role of the Court of Justice // European Law Review. - 2001. - Vol. 26, Is. 4. - P. 331-341.

292. Jacobs F.G. EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Are New Judicial Remedies Needed? // Human Rights & UK Practice. - 2003. - Vol. 4, Is. 1. - P. 120-148.

Jacobs F.G. The Evolution of the European Legal Order // Common Market Law Review. - 2004. - Vol. 41. - P. 303-316.

Jacobs F. G. Recent and Ongoing Measures to Improve the Efficiency of the European Court of Justice // European Law Review. - 2004. - Vol. 29, No. 6. - P. 823-830.

Jacobs F.G. The Evolution of European Legal Order// Common Market Law Review. - 2004. - Vol. 41. - P. 303-316.

Jacqucson C. Union Citizenship and the Court of Justice: Something New under the Sun? Toward social Citizenship / // European Law Review. - 2002. -Vol. 27, Is. 3.-P. 260-281.

Jaeckel L. The Duty to Protect Fundamental Rights in the European Community // European Law Review. - 2003. - Vol. 28, No. 4. - P. 508-527.

Jimeno-Bulnes M. European Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters // European Law Journal. - 2003. - Vol. 9, No. 5. - P. 614-630.

Joerges Ch. Taking the Law Seriously: On Political Science and the Role of Law in the Process of European Integration // European Law Journal. - 1996. -Vol.2, Is. 2.-P. 105-135.

Johannes H. The Role of the Hearing Officer // Fordham Corporate Law Institute. - 1989.--P. 315-347.

Johnston A. Judicial Reform and the Treaty of Nice // Common Market Law Review. - 2001. - Vol. 38. - P. 499-523.

Jordan A. The implementation of EU environmental policy: a policy problem without a political solution // Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. - 1999. - Vol. 17. - P. 69 -90.

Joshua J. M. The Right to be Heard in EEC Competition Procedures// Fordham International Law Journal. - 1991/1992. - Vol. 15. - P. 16-74.

Josselin J.-M., MarcianoA. How the court made a federation ofthe EU//The Review of International Organizations. - 2007. - Vol. 2. - P. 59-75.

Jouhet F. J. The Maastricht Treaty on European Union - Is Western Europe Truly Getting Closer to Unity? // Columbia Journal of European Law. - 1995. -Vol. 1. - P. 285-304.