Time limits for the entry summary declaration (ENS), January 2011

Transportation mode	Time limit for ENS submission
Containerized maritime cargo (except short sea)	24 hours before loading in each foreign load port if the vessel makes at least one call at a port in the customs territory of the EU
Bulk and break bulk maritime cargo (except short sea)	4 hours before arrival at the first port in the customs territory of the EU
Short-sea shipping: Between the customs territory of the EU (except French overseas departments, Azores, Madeira and Canary Islands) and Greenland, Faroe Islands, Ceuta, Melilla, Iceland, ports on the Baltic Sea, ports on the North Sea, ports on the Black Sea, ports on the Mediterranean, and all ports of Morocco	2 hours before arrival at the first port in the customs territory of the EU
Movements with a duration of less than 24 hours between a territory outside the customs territory of the EU and the French overseas departments, Azores, Madeira and Canary Islands	2 hours before arrival at the first port in the customs territory of the EU
Short haul flights (less than 4 hours duration)	By the time of take off
Long haul flights (duration of 4 hours or more)	4 hours before arrival at the first airport in the customs territory of the EU
Rail and inland waterways	2 hours before arrival at the customs office of entry in the customs territory of the EU
Road traffic	At least 1 hour before arrival at the customs office of entry in the customs territory of the EU
Combined transport	The applicable time limit is determined by the mode of transport that enters the customs territory of the EU

Source: WTO Secretariat, based on European Commission working document TAXUD/2010/0051, Customs Code Committee: Guidelines on entry and summary declarations in the context of Regulation No. 648/2005, 29 October 2010.

10. EU member States may grant authorized economic operator status to interested persons involved in activities covered by customs legislation. EU customs legislation specifies the criteria that member States must consider in assessing applications for authorized economic operator status.[16] Participation in authorized economic operator programmes is voluntary. Programme benefits depend on the type of certificate granted to the economic operator, and may include fewer customs controls, priority treatment during customs controls, and reduced data requirements when filing an ENS. The European Commission has published guidelines to ensure "a common understanding and uniform application of the new customs legislation related to the [authorized economic operator] concept, and to guarantee the transparency and an equal treatment of economic operators."[17] In addition, the EU set up a helpdesk and a dedicated network of contact points between the Commission and national customs authorities to ensure the uniform application of the authorized economic operator programme.

11. Participation in EU authorized economic operator programmes is not open to persons established outside the EU, unless the economic operator is established in a country that has concluded a mutual recognition agreement with the EU. There is one such agreement, with Japan. Non-established airline and shipping companies that have a regional office in the EU and that benefit from certain customs simplification measures under the Customs Code Implementing Regulation may also apply for authorized status.[18] Applications for authorized status must be submitted to the member State with "the best knowledge of the applicant's customs related activities".[19] Authorized status granted by one member State must be recognized by the customs authorities of all other member States.

12. Under EU customs legislation, national customs administrations must issue advance written rulings on tariff classification and origin matters.[20] Advance rulings issued by the customs authorities of one member State are binding on national customs authorities of all other member States.[21] The Customs Code Implementing Regulation sets out a procedure to resolve inconsistencies in binding information issued by two or more member States.[22] The European Commission maintains a public online database of advance written rulings on tariff classification.[23]

13. The 2007 Customs Audit Guide, agreed between the Commission and member States, sets out a voluntary framework for post-clearance audits carried out by national authorities of member States.

(ii) Customs valuation

14. There have been no changes in customs valuation legislation since the last Review of the EU, in 2009. The main legislation is the EU Customs Code (Articles 28-36), and its Implementing Regulation (Articles 141-181a, and Annexes 23-29). The EU notified its customs valuation legislation and replied to the checklist of issues on customs valuation to the GATT, prior to the establishment of the WTO.[24]

15. The transaction value is the primary basis for determining customs value in the EU. It includes international freight, insurance, and other c.i.f. charges.[25] Around 95% of all import declarations are accepted in accordance with the transaction value method. Administrative and judicial review of customs valuation decisions are subject to appeal in each member State (see section (i) above).

16. The Customs Valuation Section of the Customs Code Committee has published a compendium with commentaries and conclusions on specific valuation topics.[26] The compendium, which contains an overview of European Court of Justice rulings relating to customs valuation, is updated regularly and available to the public.

(iii) Rules of origin

17. The EU applies non-preferential and preferential rules or origin. The legal basis for non-preferential rules of origin is Articles 22-26 of the Customs Code, and articles 35-65 of the Implementing Regulation. Non-preferential rules of origin are applied for several purposes, including the application of quantitative restrictions, MFN tariff quotas, origin marking, contingency measures, and government procurement.

18. The test to determine the origin for non-preferential purposes of imported goods produced in more than one country is "substantial transformation". Under this test, a good is considered to originate in the country where it underwent its "last, substantial, economically justified processing or working in an undertaking equipped for that purpose and resulting in the manufacture of a new product or representing an important stage of manufacture".[27] For certain goods, a list of working or processing operations is contained in Annexes 10 and 11 of the Implementing Regulation. Furthermore, the "list rules" published by the European Commission provide guidance to national customs authorities in assessing "substantial transformation".[28] In general, these rules are expressed as a shift in tariff heading or subheading in the HS nomenclature, a specified minimum level of value added, or a specific manufacturing or processing operation.

19. In October 2010, the European Parliament adopted the Commission's proposal for a regulation establishing a scheme for origin marking.[29] The proposed regulation would introduce compulsory origin marking for certain industrial products imported from non-EU countries except Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland, and Turkey. The proposed regulation's definition of country of origin is based on the EU's non-preferential rules of origin. The products covered include textiles, footwear, leather, furniture, ceramic, and jewellery. The draft regulation must be adopted by the Council before its entry into force. Agricultural products and foodstuffs are already subject to origin marking or labelling for health, safety, or other regulatory purposes.

20. Preferential rules of origin are maintained under preferential arrangements. In general, to benefit from preferential treatment, goods that incorporate inputs from non-partner or non-beneficiary countries must undergo a certain amount of working or processing in the partner country or in the beneficiary country, as specified in an annex to each of the arrangements.

21. A regulation containing revised rules of origin for GSP entered into force in January 2011.[30] According to the Commission, this regulation "relaxes and simplifies rules and procedures for developing countries wishing to access the EU's preferential trade arrangements, while ensuring the necessary controls are in place to prevent fraud".[31] A study conducted by the Commission in 2007 concluded that the perceived complexity and restrictiveness of the rules of origin that existed prior to the introduction of the revised rules partly explained the low use of certain GSP preferences, particularly for products of interest to the least developed countries.[32]

22. The revised GSP rules of origin are expressed as changes of HS tariff heading or subheading, specific processing requirements, or value-added requirements. The sectors that use methods other than value added include agricultural and processed agricultural products, steel and non-ferrous metals, footwear, textiles and clothing, leather, and headgear and feathers. The limit on the use of non-originating materials (the "general tolerance" level) has been raised from 10% to 15%. Products under HS Chapters 50-63 remain subject to specific tolerance rules.

23. Origin rules based on the value-added method allow up to 70% content of non-originating materials for most industrial and processed agricultural products originating in the least developed countries, compared with up to 50% for other GSP beneficiary countries. For most apparel products originating in the least-developed countries, the double transformation requirement has been replaced with a single transformation requirement.

24. The revised rules of origin maintain the possibility of cumulating origin among the members of a regional group, subject to conditions. Regional cumulation operates within three regional groups.[33] In addition, the revised regulation adds a fourth group consisting of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay, and allow cumulation across certain groups, subject to conditions. Certain sensitive products are excluded from regional cumulation.

25. GSP beneficiary countries may cumulate origin with goods under Chapters 25-97 from Norway, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, and, with the entry into force of the revised rules or origin, Turkey.[34] Furthermore, the Commission may, upon request from a GSP beneficiary country, allow "extended" cumulation between that beneficiary and a country that has a free-trade agreement in force with the EU, subject to conditions. Products under Chapters 1-24 are excluded from extended cumulation.

26. Under the revised rules, a new self-certification system, the Registered Exporter System (REX), will replace the current system of origin certification by public authorities from January 2017. Under the REX, GSP beneficiary countries must set up an electronic record of registered exporters and transmit it to the European Commission. GSP beneficiary countries may receive an additional three years for the implementation of the REX if they are not in a position to implement the new system by 1 January 2017.

27. In the context of its previous Review, the European Union indicated that it would consider extending the revised rules of origin for GSP to other arrangements, depending on the level of development of the countries involved, and "once the rules are adopted and tested within the GSP scheme".[35]

(iv) Tariffs

(a) MFN tariff

28. The EU grants MFN or better treatment to WTO and non-WTO Members.

29. Under the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, common customs tariff duties are set by the European Parliament and the Council, or the Council based on a proposal from the Commission.[36] The basic legal instrument on the tariff is Regulation No. 2658/87.[37] The tariff nomenclature, known as the Combined Nomenclature, is based on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (HS). The 2011 tariff reflects the fourth amendment to the HS (HS 2007). The nomenclature and the rates of duty are contained in Annex I of Regulation No. 2658/87. An updated version of Annex I is published annually as a Commission regulation in the L-Series of the Official Journal. [38] The Combined Nomenclature is specified at the eight-digit level.

30. The EU maintains a public, online database that integrates tariff rates and other measures, including quantitative restrictions and contingency measures, applied on imports (and exports). According to the Commission, the database, known as TARIC, "secures the uniform application [of these measures] by all Member States and gives all economic operators a clear view of all measures to be undertaken when importing or exporting goods."[39] The codes under TARIC are specified at the ten-digit level.

31. The following analysis is based on the 2011 tariff. Apart from ad valorem duties, the EU applies several non- ad valorem type duties, mostly on agricultural products. Furthermore, the EU uses seasonal duties and duties that are reduced if a product's declared price is above a certain level (entry price system).[40] Entry prices apply on 28 tariff lines at the 8-digit level, including tomatoes, cucumbers, courgettes, citrus fruits, grapes, apricots, and plums. The EU uses the "Meursing Table" to determine the customs tariffs for processed agricultural products based on what they are made of. These products include confectionary, cakes, and biscuits. Their tariffs are defined according to the level of milk fats and proteins, sugar, and starch they contain. The table results in thousands of possible combinations of tariffs.

32. The Secretariat used average unit values to estimate the ad valorem equivalents (AVEs) of non- ad valorem tariff rates. The data used to calculate import unit values are from Eurostat for 2010. The analysis excludes 144 lines for which AVEs could not be estimated.[41] In the context of this Review, the Commission expressed reservations about the Secretariat's methodology for estimating AVEs.[42]

33. The 2011 tariff comprises 9,294 lines at the eight-digit level, some 400 lines less than in 2008 (Table III.2). According to the Commission, the decrease in the number of tariff lines since 2008 is the result of the modernization of the EU's tariff nomenclature. The simple average applied MFN tariff rate, including the AVEs of non- ad valorem tariff rates, was 6.4%, slightly less than in 2008. Based on the relevant WTO definition, the average applied rate for agriculture fell to 15.2% from 17.9% in 2008. This reflects increases in prices of agricultural products and the resulting reduction in the AVEs of non- ad valorem tariff rates applied on such products. The average applied rate for non-agricultural products remained unchanged at 4.1%. Around one-quarter of all tariff lines are duty free; and approximately 9% of lines are "nuisance" rates.

34. Close to 9% of all tariff lines have MFN rates exceeding 15%. Under the WTO definition, dairy is subject to the highest average tariff rate, followed by tobacco, live animals and their products, and grains (Table III.3). All rates above 100% are AVEs relating to agricultural goods; these apply on prepared or preserved mushrooms (200.6% and 153.7%), concentrated or sweetened milk and cream (164.8%), whey (139%), olive oil (159.3%), certain meats and edible meat offal (157.8% and 122.9%), and isoglucose (120.6%). The highest rates for non-agricultural products apply on motor vehicles (22%) and on fish (22-26%).

Table III.2