Ознакомьтесь с вопросами к кандидатскому экзамену и предлагаемым рассказом о научной работе аспиранта, затем ответьте на них сами, используя активный словарь этого раздела.

1) Introduce yourself, please: - What are you? - What higher school do you study at?	Let me introduce myself. My name is …
2) What field are you interested in?	I am interested in dealing in securities.
3) What literature in your specialty do you read?	I often read such journal as “Money and Credit”, “Money”, “Banks and Banking”.
4) Why did you decide to be a scientist? Was it your own decision?	In order to develop my scientific outlook I have decided to take a Master degree course at Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. I entered this course in …
5) How many exams did you take entering Master degree course?	I took three exams in special subject, in Philosophy and in English.
6) Was it an easy year in respect of your studies? Why do you think so? 7) What were you doing from entrance till final examinations?	This year was quite difficult; I’ve had to combine my work and studies, to attend classes, to read a lot of material for them getting ready for final examinations.
8) Do you prefer dealing with pure or applied sphere of science?	I prefer dealing with applied sphere of science.
9) Have you any articles published?	I don’t have any articles published yet, but I’m working at.
10) Have you started collecting and working up the material for your master’s thesis? 11) What does your research deal with? 12) What is the subject of your study? 13) What methods of investigation do you use in the preparatory work? 14) Do you need any equipment in your research? 15) Does this research have any practical value for the branch of industry you work in? 16) What is the practical use of your work? 17) What advantages does it have as compared to similar ones? 18) What are the most interesting aspects of your research work?	I have already started collecting and working up the material for my master’s thesis. My future research deals with the Russian security market and general principles of functioning of similar markets abroad. The subject of my research is different kinds of securities and stock exchanges where the given financial instruments circulate. My thesis consists of two chapters. The first chapter is devoted to the analysis of stock price fluctuations, indicators, indexes and factors. In the second chapter I am going to work out some new rules and principles to receive legible formulations. The most interesting aspect, I think, is an attempt to formulate some laws of a revolution in the field of securities in the contemporary Russian economic environment. I hope my future research will be of great importance and serve as guidance to forecast different situations at the Russian security market. I don’t use any special equipment except my notebook.
19) Are you satisfied with the result reached? 20) When do you plan to submit your thesis?	Of course, I’m not satisfied with the result reach. I have a long way to go. I plan to submit my thesis in two years, in …
21) Who is your scientific supervisor?	My scientific supervisor is Mr… He is a professor, Doctor of Economics.
22) What role does the English language play in your life and study?	The English language plays an important role in my life and study. I think of improving my speaking skills, so I’ll be able to talk to foreign specialists on my own, to take part in scientific conferences abroad. But now I am reading a lot of specialized and scientific books and journals in English searching the material for my thesis.

 

Прочитайте и переведите текст.

SCIENCE VS. PSEUDOSCIENCE

Illusion ‒ can a rope cut in half really be made whole again? Is a ghost actually present in a photograph? ‒ was the focus of Joe Nickell, author of books investigating claims of the paranormal. The paranormal, Nickell said, is a question of good science versus bad science, or science and pseudoscience. Some who investigate the paranormal begin with the answer and look only at evidence that proves that answer. Good science, however, requires looking at all evidence to delve behind the illusion. Nickell explained several cases of what were originally thought to be instances of the paranormal by showing the evidence that proved them otherwise. Here is one of them.

The media reported that a flying saucer had crashed on a ranch near Roswell, New Mexico. Nickell investigated and found that the rancher on whose property the crash took place never referred to the debris as a flying saucer; only the media described it that way. The rancher described the material he found as light and consisting of foil, sticks, rubber, string, and tape. The debris matched a balloon with a radar target attached to it. Indeed, a spy balloon sent up by the US government, in what was termed Project Mogul, was lost near Roswell.

When we speak of knowing science we do not mean simply knowing scientific facts (e.g., the distance from earth to sun; the distinction between mammal and reptile, etc.) We mean that one must clearly understand the nature of science itself— the criteria of valid evidence, the testing of hypotheses, the establishment of useful theories, the many aspects of the methods of science which make it possible to draw accurate, reliable, meaningful conclusions about the phenomena of the physical universe. Pseudoscience lays emphasis on unverifiable eyewitness testimony, stories, faked footprints, blurry photos, and tall tales, hearsay, rumor, and dubious anecdotes.

Pseudoscience writers tend simply to make up bogus “facts” where needed, instead of going to the trouble of consulting reliable reference works, much less investigating directly. Yet these fictitious facts are often central to the pseudoscientist’s argument and conclusions! The first edition of any pseudoscience book is almost always the last, even though the book may go through innumerable new printings, over decades or centuries. Compare to science textbooks, which usually see a new edition every few years because of the rapid accumulation of new facts, ideas, discoveries, experiments and insights in science.

One of the most bizarre recent tactics of pseudoscientists is to publish a novel, a work of fiction in which essentially everything is made up by the author - as usual in works of fiction! - but then to turn directly around and treat the completely made-up material as if it were actual, factual and researched. Recent examples of this tactic are The Celestine Prophecy, by James Redfield (1994), and The Da Vinci Code, by Dan Brown (2003).

Science and pseudoscience are precisely opposed ways of viewing nature. Science relies on, and insists on, difficult, narrow, strict procedures of self-questioning, testing and analytical thinking that make it hard to fool yourself or to avoid facing facts. Pseudoscience, on the other hand, preserves the ancient, irrational, unobjective modes of thought which have given rise to most superstition and to most of the fanciful and mistaken ideas about man and nature... from voodoo to racism; from the flat earth to the house-shaped universe with God in the attic, from doing rain dances to torturing and brutalizing the mentally ill to drive out the demons that possess them. Pseudoscience encourages you to believe anything you want, and supplies many examples of specious "arguments" by which you can fool yourself into thinking your belief has some validity, despite all the facts being to the contrary.

One of the features of pseudoscience is that any particular pseudoscience somehow involves almost all the other pseudosciences. Thus, someone who believes that flying saucers exist and are piloted by space aliens might also claim to communicate with the aliens via a Ouija board*; a spirit medium who is supposedly communicating with spirits of the dead might also claim to be a "psychic" who can read living minds and foretell the future. The explanation for this continuum is that pseudoscience is a manifestation of an entire anachronistic world view, evidence of an individual's powerful belief in an animistic universe that is essentially magical and fundamentally "nonmaterial." No amount of evidence, investigation or fact-finding has ever shaken a pseudoscientist's faith in his delusions.

The popularity of pseudoscience is assured, because it invariably tells us things that are reassuring far past the point of being too good to be true. You are grieving over your beloved lost pet dog? Well, this psychic lady can tell you precisely where to find it, all she has to do is touch its photo! You are 75 years old and in poor health, but this hippy-looking professor says he's right on the verge of discovering how people can live for 5,000 years, even you! Wow, where do we send our money?!? You're 100 pounds overweight and have never been able to slim down? Well, here's a new miracle diet: eat as much as you want of anything you want and still lose weight, by taking this mystical special wonder herb! Only $100 for a 2-week supply!

Moreover, the media provide a continuous bombardment of sheer nonsense, misinformation, fantasy and confusion - proclaimed to be “true facts.” Sifting sense from nonsense is an almost overwhelming job. A typical reporter asked to write an article on astrology thinks he has done a thorough job if he interviews six astrologers and one astronomer. The astronomer says it's all total bunk; the six astrologers say it's great stuff and really works and for $50 they'll be glad to cast anyone's horoscope. Everything in pseudoscience seems to generate something for sale; look for courses in how to remember past lives, how to do remote viewing, how to hunt for ghosts, how to become a prophet, how to heal yourself of any disease mentally, how to get the angels on your side, how to... you name it, you got it... but pay up first.

It is, unfortunately, vital for each citizen to learn to distinguish carefully between science and pseudoscience. In a democracy, every voter must be capable of seeking and recognizing authentic sources of information. Pseudoscience often strikes educated, rational people as too nonsensical and preposterous to be dangerous, a source of amusement rather than fear. Unfortunately, this is not a wise attitude. Pseudoscience can be extremely dangerous. Penetrating political systems, it has justified atrocities in the name of racial or religious purity; penetrating the educational system, it drives out science and sensibility; penetrating the health professions it dooms thousands to unnecessary death or suffering; penetrating religion, it generates fanaticism, intolerance, and holy war; penetrating the communications media, it makes it nearly impossible for voters to obtain factual information on public issues of extreme importance.

So, to overcome illusion we have to resort to a bit of critical thinking the goal of which is to arrive at the most reasonable beliefs and take the most reasonable actions.

 

NOTES:

* A Quija board (correctly pronounced "wee-jah" /wiʤə/ although often pronounced "wee-gee") is any flat surface printed with letters, numbers, and other symbols, to which a planchette or movable indicator points, supposedly in answer to questions from people at a séance. The fingers of the participants are placed on the planchette that then moves about the board to spell out messages.